excuse me
Yeah you said this yesterday and I didn't find it funny then either.
Posted by: BML The on Thu March 17, 2005 at 10:40I want obsessions with names that are easy to play around with.
Posted by: Mel on Thu March 17, 2005 at 12:25 @ BML.
Tough shit.
I do.
Sorry Melker.
Posted by: Wam on Thu March 17, 2005 at 13:53So you visit your site from work now huh? I thought you weren't going to.
Posted by: JarJar on Thu March 17, 2005 at 15:12Done that for weeks now.
I wasn't going to but then I got very very bored and thought fuck it.
You think "fuck it" and I just think "fuck me", but there's no one to hear it sorry...erm, I find that SqizzTay joke quite subtle Like it
Posted by: Val on Fri March 18, 2005 at 0:05hehehehe! but didn't Miss L.J. have something to do with the original or was she just in Lux at the time? Was it THAT long ago?!
Posted by: squiZZ on Fri March 18, 2005 at 3:46I haven't got the slightest clue when I first started using it. I think it was for a forum signature. Don't think she'd have anything to do with it since she probably would have gone if anything.
Thanks Val. I find it very clever too. lol @ fuck me, you're incorrigible.
Posted by: Clarissa on Fri March 18, 2005 at 10:16"My obsessions" should be updated.
Posted by: JarJar on Fri March 18, 2005 at 10:35Yeah I considered it but they are long term obsessions so he doesn't qualify yet. I guess I should remove squiZZ but wouldn't that be cruel?
Posted by: Clarissa on Fri March 18, 2005 at 11:48Aaaah I see. How come LJ wasn't here? Or horse? And why delete squiZZ? Are these only current obsessions? And I'm not convinced the squizz obsession is over.
Posted by: JarJar on Fri March 18, 2005 at 12:51none of those qualify as an obsession ("an irrational preoccupation" according to answers.com).
And yes they're only current obsessions.
And I am sooooo over squiZZ!
Well maybe I'm not but I am no longer obsessed with him. The obsession transfer to Tay has been successfully completed.
That's not what you explained to me the other day.
ANd hmmmmmm re. squiZZ/Tay.
Posted by: JarJar on Fri March 18, 2005 at 21:30No? I think we were talking about "in love" rather than "obsessed"? Or, well... it's hard to explain.
And pfffft!
Posted by: Clarissa on Sat March 19, 2005 at 0:17Yes, but you say there's no difference between "in love" and "obsessed" to you.
Posted by: JarJar on Sat March 19, 2005 at 12:15I said what normal people call "in love" I may as well call "obsessed" in my case (since I don't want sex/relationship etc). But not every obsession is love. I am hardly "in love" with vampires or the devil. I still have an irrational fascination with them.
Posted by: Clarissa on Sat March 19, 2005 at 20:01Just to let you know, even though u might know already, and even though you might not give a shit - managers get a printout of who was on what website for how long every week/month. It's a requirement.
I was told that in the bank but it didn't get to me, then when I was a clinical manager's secretary they showed me somebody's internet usage which was about 5 pages long and I was like "god!!". It hit home then LOL.
Ok, so now I've told you. Bye.
Posted by: Woods on Sun March 20, 2005 at 18:55Posted by: Clarissa on Sun March 20, 2005 at 20:13